A real conversation about theodicy, immune systems, Simondon, Deleuze, Alexander, Benjamin, capability security, Hardt and Negri, and Ostrom — and how they all turned out to describe the same design decisions in a text-adventure engine's world-description language.
Some quick notes on a couple of weeks of small-bore hacking.
I built friendsof.wiki to surface the open knowledge graph alongside Wikipedia articles, and learned a few things along the way.
LLMs are engines. Harnesses are everything else—the wheels, brakes, dashboard, GPS—that turn a raw engine into a useful vehicle. First in a series on harnesses for the open knowledge commons.
Good behaviour matters more than good code
A defence of digital stewardship, IndieWeb principles, Blackfoot models of collective flourishing, and what it means to plant seeds in a garden you'll never see. From Garrett Hardin's infamous 1968 essay to Elinor Ostrom's Nobel Prize-winning refutation, the tragedy of the commons was never inevitable. It was always a choice.
In a Japanese mountain village, a detective patrolling the closed commons found thirty intruders cutting bamboo poles for their vegetable trellises. Among them were heads of leading households. The village headman had set the opening date too late — the farmers' crops might be lost.
The shared rivalrous resource on social networks isn't data. It's attention.
Am Montag habe ich die Einleitung zu Sven Beckerts Geschichte des Kapitalismus (Beckert, 2025a) gelesen. Ich habe die englische Epub-Version gekauft; das Buch ist auch auf deutsch erschienen (Beckert, 2025b) und medial zu Recht gerade sehr präsent. Empfehlenswert zur Orientierung ist Thilo Jungs Gespräch mit Beckert bei „Jung und Naiv“ (Jung & Naiv, 2026). Die...